No offense, but...
 Isn't it great that someone take their time to implement the interface to 
SQLite when oneself is not talent/or lack the knowledge how to do it !. If 
SQLite will evolve and that is delayed/not implemented in ooSQLite, well you 
can always do the implementation yourself, but as I see it, you can't demand 
that it should be incorporated in ooSQLite.
That kind of support normally is something one have to pay for, so building a 
"commercial" ooREXX application with ooSQLite, one can't demand anything from 
the developers of ooREXX/ooSQLite.  The developed application is one owns 
responsibility and any demands should be solved by oneself or just accept the 
current status of the ooREXX/ooSQLite..
As English is not my native language, I don't want to argue, just to give some 
of my thoughts.
I think ooREXX/ooSQLite/ooDialog is a great piece of software and are very 
satisfied with it.
Great work !
/hex

-------------------------
Ursprungligt Meddelande:
Från: Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge <jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org>
Till: oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Kopia: 
Datum: fredag, 15 juni 2012 17:17
Ämne: Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooSQLiteDB name change to ooSQLiteDbConn or ?
Mark Miesfeld <miesf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If the ooSQLite package gets included in the ooRexx distribution then an
> application written that uses ooSQLite will run on any system where the
> user of the application has ooRexx installed.  And the user will not have
> to install anything else.

But hopefully there's some way that the user can choose to install something
else - a different build of whatever binary you provide, that has a
different SQLite build inside(*) it?   

 * - if it is statically linked 'inside' your binary?  Or are you allowing
     a named DLL to be loaded by your interface code?


I know from reading the SQLite users mail list - though I've not yet used
SQLite for anything - that some users also make custom builds of SQLite
themselves (see compile flags at http://www.sqlite.org/compile.html ).  I
would expect that if someone was using a custom-built SQLite binary for some
application they'd want to be able to include it or build an equivalent into
an instance of the ooRexx SQLite package, if they wanted to use ooRexx as
part of that application.
   
-- 
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to