On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Chip Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/28/2012 08:46 Rony G. Flatscher said:
>> Just did that and saw that you yourself had not done that vote up.
>
> I had not bumped the RFE because I wanted to initiate a discussion

Actually I think Rony meant Michael had not bumped up his own RFE, but
that's not that relevant.

> about the implementation of it, first.  Specifically, Michael
> suggested a flag to indicate that every file should be returned.
>
> My point was that "return every file" should be the default behavior,
> and that the interface could use flags, RE's, wildcards, arguments, or
> whatever, to indicate something less than every file was desired.
>
> I know the "backwards compatibility" argument will be raised, but the

But what about "backwards compatibility?"

I agree with you that the reasonable default for the "S" flags would
have been all files.  But it wasn't implemented that way on Unix-like
systems.  It's been that way for a long time, probably forever.  If we
suddenly changed the behavior, programs like the ones Michael has
already written and has been using would no longer produce the same
results.

Is that okay to do just because the original default wasn't reasonable?

That's the question I'm interested in.

> I have now bumped this RFE, primarily to encourage someone to look at
> the issue.  I would prefer that the solution suggested by the RFE not
> be the way it is implemented.

Did you add a comment stating that also?

--
Mark Miesfeld

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to