Nope, no architectural reasons for not doing this. Rick
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Erich Steinböck <[email protected] > wrote: > I'd like to suggest to change (OrderedCollection's) appendAll and > (MapCollection's, Bag's and Set's) putAll methods to return the target > collection as their result. Currently they do not return a result. > > Any reasons not to do so, e.g. architectural concern, compatibility? > > Same suggestion for Array's fill method. > > All existing ~~appendAll/putAll/fill code should of course continue to > run unmodified, just the double "~" wouldn't be *required* any more. > > Erich > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
