It seems like a good idea to me then. Jon
On 1 November 2015 at 17:29, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope, no architectural reasons for not doing this. > > Rick > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Erich Steinböck < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd like to suggest to change (OrderedCollection's) appendAll and >> (MapCollection's, Bag's and Set's) putAll methods to return the target >> collection as their result. Currently they do not return a result. >> >> Any reasons not to do so, e.g. architectural concern, compatibility? >> >> Same suggestion for Array's fill method. >> >> All existing ~~appendAll/putAll/fill code should of course continue to >> run unmodified, just the double "~" wouldn't be *required* any more. >> >> Erich >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
