>
> I don't see any issue when I run the mutable buffer program on 64-bit
My fault: the MutableBuffer code I posted had a typo ..
MutableBuffer~new(1e9) should have read new(, 1e9)
No issue, if the buffer length is correctly given at initialization.
I've removed the Mutable buffer case from the bug report, as this is just
the same re-allocation fragmentation issue.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
