For what it is worth I use cmake version 3.11.4 on a Mac running High Sierra
and have seen no problems (but a lot of warnings for deprecated stuff).
Von meinen Macbook gesendet
Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se
> Am 01.08.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>:
>
> Ok, I rolled it back to 2.8. However, I also feel that lack of support on
> older platforms should not be something that should prevent us from using
> newer features in the future. Lack of support for new versions of development
> tooling should be a criteria that should be used to prune the supported
> systems list.
>
> Rick
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 1:59 PM Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com
> <mailto:erich.steinbo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Also some of our Jenkins build server slaves can't build any more due to the
> minimum required CMake version change.
> Ubuntu 16.04 just has CMake 3.5 in it's repo, CentOS 7 just 2.8, and one of
> the macOS slaves is at 3.2 (is there such a thing as a repository on MacOS?).
>
> As long as there's no real functional requirement for CMake above 2.8, I'd
> vote for reversing the minimum requirement change back to 2.8.
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
> <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
> An update to the minimum version number. While trying to create ooRexx
> 5.0beta on Ubuntu I noticed that only version 3.5 was available there as of
> yesterday, which could not be used to build ooRexx as its minimum CMake level
> is set to 3.8. (Went to cmake.org <http://cmake.org/> and downloaded the
> latest version for Linux from there which successfully built ooRexx.)
>
> The question would be whether it would be possible to use as minimum 3.5,
> such that "bread-and-butter"-Linux systems could be used to build ooRexx
> (thinking of zLinux, not knowing how up-to-date their cmake would be).
>
> ---rony
>
> On 15.07.2018 08:36, Mark L. Gaubatz wrote:
>> Given the many projects for which I am using CMake, I would strongly
>> recommend 3.5 or higher as the minimum base. VS 2017 includes integration
>> support for 3.7.2 and higher. 3.8 introduces language level standards.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> <mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 6:28 AM
>> To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
>> <oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> <mailto:oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Subject: [Oorexx-devel] CMake minimum version and policies.
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to separate this thread out from Rony's question about the SVN build
>> number.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm thinking it is time to take a look at updating the minimum SVN version
>> and the policies. Currently, we're sort stuck on CMake 2.8, while the latest
>> version is 3.11. I think at a minimum, we should bump the minimum version to
>> 3.0, or possibly higher.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for the CMP0010 OLD policy, this only controlled whether invalid
>> variable reference syntax was a warning or an error. I'm not sure why David
>> decided we needed to set this, but everything builds cleanly with the NEW
>> behaviour, so I think this should just be removed. Also, if we upgrade to at
>> least 3.0, we can remove the conditional setting of the CMP0042 policy,
>> since that will be the default.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rick
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot>_______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
