On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:47 PM P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se> wrote:
> Dear René, > > This was a change on my proposal, ooRexx5.0.0 is somewhat over specified > and will be incorrect as soon as ooRexx 5.0.1 arrives. ooRexx5 is > sufficient to separate it from ooRexx 4. > this should probably be at least 2 digits, as a 5.1.0 release would mean there are new features that are not in 5.0.x. > > If you try one of the dmg installers I have built here > <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p66c7g01h4jz5ss/AAAZd_Q2yQddrTHagxPo_UiTa?dl=0> > you > can actually just double click the dmg and then drag the entire „app“ to > wherever you want it, the installation bundle appears as a single file on > macOS. > > The latest installers also include the PDF documentation btw. > > The default installation to ~/Applications poses two problems: > > 1: ~/Applications does not exist on a freshly installed macOS > > 2: The user needs to amend the path to make the installation fly. > > <Flame resistant suit on> > > Problem 1 goes away with an install to /Applications instead of > ~/Applications > > Since the installation is atomic it can be dragged to the bin so there is > no uninstall process necessary. > > And, I just checked - you do not need elevated rights to install into > /Applications > > Just an idea… > > <Flame resistant suit off> > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se > > > > Am 08.04.2020 um 23:13 schrieb René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl>: > > I have funny stuff going on also: my MacOSX build kept telling me that it > was from June 2019 (which might be the last time I built on this particular > mac). > Checking up on it, I found that it now installs in ~/Applications/ooRexx5 > instead of ~/Applications/ooRexx5.0.0 > > No big deal but a tad surprising. > > René. > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 18:04, P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se> wrote: > > @Enrico: did you use the rexx -v to confirm the version? For both versions? > > If so I have a rotten build :-( > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se > > > > Am 08.04.2020 um 17:48 schrieb Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel < > oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>: > > Going back and forth between builds 12050 and 12054 > Did not cause any problems on centos 8 > > Also using the —replacefiles clause lets You install over an existing > installation without uninstalling the previous one > > After that the rpm -e must be qualified > And uninstalling the older only cleanups the rpm/dnf install database > And leaves a working rexx > > enrico > > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 16:34, Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Try installing an older build (rpm module) after removing the newer build > > I don't think I can as the two RPM-based slaves CentOS and SLES390 I have > access to don't have full sudo access. > > Enrico, can you maybe test what P.O. asks for? > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel