On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:47 PM P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se> wrote:

> Dear René,
>
> This was a change on my proposal, ooRexx5.0.0 is somewhat over specified
> and will be incorrect as soon as ooRexx 5.0.1 arrives. ooRexx5 is
> sufficient to separate it from ooRexx 4.
>

this should probably be at least 2 digits, as a 5.1.0 release would mean
there are new features that are not in 5.0.x.

>
> If you try one of the dmg installers I have built here
> <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p66c7g01h4jz5ss/AAAZd_Q2yQddrTHagxPo_UiTa?dl=0> 
> you
> can actually just double click the dmg and then drag the entire „app“ to
> wherever you want it, the installation bundle appears as a single file on
> macOS.
>
> The latest installers also include the PDF documentation btw.
>
> The default installation to ~/Applications poses two problems:
>
> 1: ~/Applications does not exist on a freshly installed macOS
>
> 2: The user needs to amend the path to make the installation fly.
>
> <Flame resistant suit on>
>
> Problem 1 goes away with an install to /Applications instead of
> ~/Applications
>
> Since the installation is atomic it can be dragged to the bin so there is
> no uninstall process necessary.
>
> And, I just checked - you do not need elevated rights to install into
> /Applications
>
> Just an idea…
>
> <Flame resistant suit off>
>
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se
>
>
>
> Am 08.04.2020 um 23:13 schrieb René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl>:
>
> I have funny stuff going on also: my MacOSX build kept telling me that it
> was from June 2019 (which might be the last time I built on this particular
> mac).
> Checking up on it, I found that it now installs in ~/Applications/ooRexx5
> instead of ~/Applications/ooRexx5.0.0
>
> No big deal but a tad surprising.
>
> René.
>
> On 8 Apr 2020, at 18:04, P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se> wrote:
>
> @Enrico: did you use the rexx -v to confirm the version? For both versions?
>
> If so I have a rotten build :-(
>
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se
>
>
>
> Am 08.04.2020 um 17:48 schrieb Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel <
> oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>:
>
> Going back and forth between builds 12050 and 12054
> Did not cause any problems  on centos 8
>
> Also using the —replacefiles clause lets You install over an existing
> installation without uninstalling  the previous one
>
> After that the rpm -e must be qualified
> And uninstalling the older only cleanups the rpm/dnf install database
> And leaves a working rexx
>
> enrico
>
>
> On 8 Apr 2020, at 16:34, Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Try installing an older build (rpm module) after removing the newer build
>
> I don't think I can as the two RPM-based slaves CentOS and SLES390 I have
> access to don't have full sudo access.
>
> Enrico, can you maybe test what P.O. asks for?
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to