On 16.07.2021 15:03, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
... cut ...
> A question on the „fat Binaries“: I cannot see any trace of different
> versions of the files in the
> installer, can you please elaborate? I do not have any M1 hardware to test it
> on.
This was a remark for Enrico, who kindly submitted changes to CMake to allow
the creation of a
universal version of ooRexx which includes both architectures. In parallel I
created a fat version
of BSF4ooRexx to create an installation package that included both, the Intel
and the M1 version.
Unfortunately, the arm64 binaries from BSF4ooRexx and ooRexx would not get
loaded on M1 with a
rather meaningless error message ("... not found ..."). My take now is that it
might have to do with
this "security policy" issue of which I am not sure whether it can be solved
with Renés xattr
command there. Have asked a student who has a M1 and has been really, really
eager to get BSF4ooRexx
installed and available on it as well. [Unfortunately, I do not have a M1 to
test, so am dependent
on others and their ree time.]
The original idea was, that once this works, it should be incorporated into the
official ooRexx
project (via a patch) as Enrico is good with doing so (I would declare this
with the patch, such
that the origin and the license of the patch is put out of question). But have
not heard from Enrico
in a while, maybe this findings can get everything going again.
---rony
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
