Dear P.O., On 12.10.2021 18:03, P.O. Jonsson wrote: > Dear Rony, you misunderstood my question, It is not about the installation > folder (/usr/local ) > which makes sense on Linux, unix, I only asked if it makes sense to change > /share/ooRexx to > /share/ooRexx/samples also on macOS,
oh, I see! > and and likewise change /share/ooRexx/native.api to > /share/ooRexx/samples/native.api No this currently got changed from "share/ooRexx/native.api" to "share/ooRexx/samples/native.api". > Regarding the "doc" sub-sub-sub-folder I find your proposal counterintuitive, > al least for macOS, > The documentation should be readily available, not in a folder 3 layers down On MacOS there would be a directory layout for Frameworks and Applications that Apple suggests (therefore the layout of the Mac BSF4ooRexx installer is structured the way it is, cf. [1], [2]). Looking at different MacOS installations in the /Applications folder shows that application developers do not necessarily adhere to the Apple suggested layout. As such I think you are free to define any directory structure that you think is intuitive and helpful. ---rony [1] Application Bundles: <https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/CoreFoundation/Conceptual/CFBundles/BundleTypes/BundleTypes.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/10000123i-CH101-SW13> [2] Framework Bundles: <https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFrameworks/Concepts/FrameworkAnatomy.html> _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
