On 17.10.2021 17:14, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>
> Am 17.10.2021 um 12:54 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
> <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>>:
>>
>> So running cmake with -DBUILD_OSX_UNIVERSAL_BINARIES=1 should already allow 
>> to create
>> fat/universal versions.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> ---rony
>>
>>
> Will try it out, not sure what effect this will have on the naming of the dmg 
> file. We will see.

Please let us know.

Would prefer fat binaries as they make it easier for the Apple crowd which is 
confronted with having
to do an xattr to remove that Apple attribute that in effect sabotages packages 
and programs that
are not registered with Apple (which I think is a no go and abuse of market 
power for various
reasons) to run.

> BTW when I tried your BSF fat binary the other day I had a number of errors 
> during the test, did
> you follow this up?

Did look briefly into it and it seems the failures were in some tests where 
binaries got created and
used in tests if I recall correctly. As the binaries got created from trunk and 
the tests (quite
stressful ones) I conducted were o.k., I did not look into them.

---rony


_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to