Hi P.O., thank you for your efforts and fixing this!
Ad fixups: maybe you can do them? (AFAIK I am nit the author fir that passage.) Cheers —-rony Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e) > Am 13.10.2021 um 22:55 schrieb P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se>: > > Dear Rony et al, > > on macOS/Darwin the testsuite could not locate the samples any more following > the move from .../ooRexx to .../ooRexx/samples, here one example: > > [failure] 20211012 22:35:08.684320 > svn: r12223 Change date: 2021-03-31 21:12:04 +0200 > Test: TEST_USECOMP > Class: USECOMP.TESTGROUP > File: .../ooRexx/samples/usecomp.testGroup > Line: 63 > Failed: assertNotNil > Expected: not .nil > Actual: .nil > > Interpreter: REXX-ooRexx_5.0.0(MT)_64-bit 6.05 12 Oct 2021 > OS Name: DARWIN > SysVersion: Darwin 17.7.0 > > I have amended locateSamplePrg() in Fileutils.cls and amended > > do samples over "samples/", "../samples/", "../share/ooRexx/", > "../Shared/ooRexx/" > > to > > do samples over "samples/", "../samples/", "../share/ooRexx/samples/", > "../Shared/ooRexx/samples/" > > And now the samples can be found again on macOS/Darwin > > I think the comments in locateSamplePrg() may need some cleaning up but since > I did not write them I leave it to the originator (Rony?) to check and amend > if necessary. > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se > > > >> Am 12.10.2021 um 20:03 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>: >> >> Dear P.O., >> >> On 12.10.2021 18:03, P.O. Jonsson wrote: >>> Dear Rony, you misunderstood my question, It is not about the installation >>> folder (/usr/local ) >>> which makes sense on Linux, unix, I only asked if it makes sense to change >>> /share/ooRexx to >>> /share/ooRexx/samples also on macOS, >> >> oh, I see! >> >>> and and likewise change /share/ooRexx/native.api to >>> /share/ooRexx/samples/native.api >> >> No this currently got changed from "share/ooRexx/native.api" to >> "share/ooRexx/samples/native.api". >> >>> Regarding the "doc" sub-sub-sub-folder I find your proposal >>> counterintuitive, al least for macOS, >>> The documentation should be readily available, not in a folder 3 layers down >> >> On MacOS there would be a directory layout for Frameworks and Applications >> that Apple suggests >> (therefore the layout of the Mac BSF4ooRexx installer is structured the way >> it is, cf. [1], [2]). >> Looking at different MacOS installations in the /Applications folder shows >> that application >> developers do not necessarily adhere to the Apple suggested layout. As such >> I think you are free to >> define any directory structure that you think is intuitive and helpful. >> >> ---rony >> >> [1] Application Bundles: >> <https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/CoreFoundation/Conceptual/CFBundles/BundleTypes/BundleTypes.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/10000123i-CH101-SW13> >> >> [2] Framework Bundles: >> <https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFrameworks/Concepts/FrameworkAnatomy.html> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
