On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:01 AM CV Bruce <cvbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’ve played with ChatGPT, nothing as complex as your example, and it is > amazing. > But don’t underestimate that Rick had the expertise to recognize that the > first solution presented had the same problems as the current code. Rick > was also able to criticize the solution, which enabled the AI to generate a > better solution. Again, Rick had the expertise to evaluate the second > solution as to its suitability. >
I was able to criticize it, but had serious doubts I could phrase things well enough that ChatGPT would understand the problem. I have had a hard enough time explaining it to actual people. The fact it understood my one-sentence clarification well enought to zero in on what I believe to be a workable solution was nothing sort of amazing. I had previous spent two month trying to figure this out with no success. The other part I like is that this is like StackOverflow without all of the snarking responses :-) Rick > > It kind of seems like the days when people checked the assembler created > by the compiler to make sure the compiler was “doing it right”. > > I think we are crossing a bridge from one technology to the next, and > until full faith can be give to the new technology, check and check again. > > Bruce > > Sent by Magic! > > On Jan 23, 2023, at 6:42 AM, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:34 AM Sahananda Sahananda <sahana...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Rick, >> >> Fascinating! >> >> I'm really impressed and grateful for the time that you put into trying >> to solve this question. >> >> Did ChatGPT provide the comments and variable names as well? >> > > That was a direct cut and paste from the chat session. It provided > anything. > > >> >> Do you think it 'created' that code or merely 'found it' already solved >> by human brains? >> > > I actually think it created the code. As a result of the chat, it needed > to make adjustments to the orginal code. Also, I spent a LOT of time > looking for an example like this one, in any form. If a clear one like this > had existed, I believe I would have found it. > > Rick > >> >> Jon >> >> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 14:21, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 23.01.2023 14:17, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: >>> > >>> >> "but still humans need to be able to >>> >> understand and assess/control them otherwise humanity becomes >>> >> helpless and dependent over time" >>> > So it just happens earlier in life ...? :-)) >>> Indeed! 😂 >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Oorexx-devel mailing list >>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
