Great, thanks. I have committed all the changes to SVN. A few tickets
remain open, but the bulk of the issues are now fixed, specifically the
memory corruption problems.

Let's see how it goes. Thanks for the feedback and testing!

M


On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 11:28 PM Jean Louis Faucher <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Moritz
>
>
> On 1 Aug 2026, at 21:15, Moritz Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jean,
>
> I tried enabling IPO/LTO, and it seems to work fine on all supported
> platforms. OpenBSD does not seem to support LTO, but all other platforms
> show no difference in undefined behavior compared to non-LTO builds. I
> think we should try enabling it again once the undefined behavior fixes are
> implemented.
>
> You can check the test runs here:
>
>   - https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617550
>   - https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617554
>   - https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617566
>
>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Other success: The test suite with IPO no longer crashes on WSL for
> Windows ARM.
>
>
>
> I plan to merge the fixes sometime next week.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> rexxcps on macOS, 5 runs:
>
> ci/platforms with IPO/LTO 26885093 26816314 26924713 26646605 26625486
> REXX clauses per second
>
> It's better than the previous results I communicated a few days ago:
> rexxcps on macOS, 5 runs:
> oorexx 5 25248593 25152888 25126680 25316819 25216759 REXX clauses per
> second
> concurrency-dispatch-fixes 25058219 25080047 25053259 25104624 25087157
> REXX clauses per second
>
> 6.0% faster than oorexx 5 without your fixes.
> 6.8% faster than concurrency-dispatch-fixes.
> This is within the range of improvements that Enrico observed in 2020.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/mailman/oorexx-devel/thread/EF50446F-5B4F-442D-BCD2-CE2CFEDE8AC7%40mac.com/#msg37080771
>
>
>
> This improvement is not visible in the test suite duration.
> Sometimes ooRexx 5 without IPO is faster; sometimes ci/platforms with IPO
> is faster.
> For the same executable, I can see variations of up to ±10 seconds from
> one run to another.
> So, no reliable conclusion can be drawn.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>


-- 
Moritz Hoffmann;
http://antiguru.de/
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to