This is just to inform that the following platforms build with error ArchLinux Manjaro ubuntu16 ubuntu16-debug
Solaris was offline so I have restarted it, I will look tomorrow if the build was ok I have not looked in detail on the test jobs but there are some errors here and there. P.O. Jonsson Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Am 02.08.2026 um 21:47 schrieb Moritz Hoffmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > Great, thanks. I have committed all the changes to SVN. A few tickets remain > open, but the bulk of the issues are now fixed, specifically the memory > corruption problems. > > Let's see how it goes. Thanks for the feedback and testing! > > M > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 11:28 PM Jean Louis Faucher <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Moritz > > >> On 1 Aug 2026, at 21:15, Moritz Hoffmann <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Jean, >> >> I tried enabling IPO/LTO, and it seems to work fine on all supported >> platforms. OpenBSD does not seem to support LTO, but all other platforms >> show no difference in undefined behavior compared to non-LTO builds. I think >> we should try enabling it again once the undefined behavior fixes are >> implemented. >> >> You can check the test runs here: >> >> - https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617550 >> <https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617550> >> - https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617554 >> <https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617554> >> - https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617566 >> <https://github.com/antiguru/ooRexx/actions/runs/30713617566> > > > Thank you very much! > > Other success: The test suite with IPO no longer crashes on WSL for Windows > ARM. > > >> >> I plan to merge the fixes sometime next week. > > +1 > > > > rexxcps on macOS, 5 runs: > > ci/platforms with IPO/LTO 26885093 26816314 26924713 26646605 26625486 REXX > clauses per second > > It's better than the previous results I communicated a few days ago: > rexxcps on macOS, 5 runs: > oorexx 5 25248593 25152888 25126680 25316819 25216759 REXX clauses per > second > concurrency-dispatch-fixes 25058219 25080047 25053259 25104624 25087157 REXX > clauses per second > > 6.0% faster than oorexx 5 without your fixes. > 6.8% faster than concurrency-dispatch-fixes. > This is within the range of improvements that Enrico observed in 2020. > https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/mailman/oorexx-devel/thread/EF50446F-5B4F-442D-BCD2-CE2CFEDE8AC7%40mac.com/#msg37080771 > > <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/mailman/oorexx-devel/thread/EF50446F-5B4F-442D-BCD2-CE2CFEDE8AC7%40mac.com/#msg37080771> > > > > This improvement is not visible in the test suite duration. > Sometimes ooRexx 5 without IPO is faster; sometimes ci/platforms with IPO is > faster. > For the same executable, I can see variations of up to ±10 seconds from one > run to another. > So, no reliable conclusion can be drawn. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel> > > > -- > Moritz Hoffmann; > http://antiguru.de/ > <http://antiguru.de/>_______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
