On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Staffan Tylen <staffan.ty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark, thanks for your quick feedback. The main reason for not using the > binaries at this stage is that I'm in a research phase to see what options I > have available for database encryption. I'm not aware of a binary solution > that supports encrypted SQLite under ooRexx. So I'm looking at the > feasibility of putting something together using for example source code for > ooSQLite and SQLCipher. If there in fact is a binary solution I would > clearly look at that first. Staffan, If there was a standard extension to SQLite that did encryption, I could be tempted into doing a standard ooSQLite build that included that extension. For example, one of the extensions to SQLite is full text search. If people wanted that, I would think about including in the standard distribution a build that has that extension compiled in, along with the regular build. Haven't given thought yet to naming. Maybe also supply a ooSQLiteFTS.cls file that would load the FTS build instead of the normal ooSQLite.dll If there was some demand for an encrypted SQLite usage, I'd think about producing that. Wouldn't want to produce a bunch of one of a kind builds, but one or two different builds might be reasonable. -- Mark Miesfeld ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Oorexx-users mailing list Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
