Mark, this discussion maybe could be of some interest:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8384789/encrypting-sqlite
Staffan
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Mark Miesfeld <miesf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Mark Miesfeld <miesf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Staffan Tylen <staffan.ty...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Mark, thanks for your quick feedback. The main reason for not using the
> >> binaries at this stage is that I'm in a research phase to see what
> options I
> >> have available for database encryption. I'm not aware of a binary
> solution
> >> that supports encrypted SQLite under ooRexx. So I'm looking at the
> >> feasibility of putting something together using for example source code
> for
> >> ooSQLite and SQLCipher. If there in fact is a binary solution I would
> >> clearly look at that first.
> >
> >
> > If there was a standard extension to SQLite that did encryption, I
> > could be tempted into doing a standard ooSQLite build that included
> > that extension.
>
> Sorry, I should have looked as SQLCipher first, before I said
> anything. SQLCipher is a completely different library than the SQLite
> library. It has different licensing that makes it not attractive to
> me for ooRexx.
>
> You will not be able to use SQLCipher with the approach you are
> taking. You will have to replace the SQLite source code completely
> with the SQLCipher source code in the source tree. Unless the
> SQLCiper source code files are a one-to-one relation with the SQLite
> source files, you will then need to change the make file to build and
> link the correct object files.
>
> Most of the Rexx bindings in the ooSQLite class file will probably
> work, but you might have to change a few things.
>
> You wouldn't have to, but you should change the name of the DLL
> produced by your build to something different. And change the .cls
> file to load that DLL. Otherwise you may end up using the wrong DLL.
>
> You end up with a different database engine and your own native
> extension. Certainly there is no reason why you can't do that based
> on the current work for ooSQLite. But, I'm not sure it is something
> someone unfamiliar with C / C++ will have an easy time doing.
>
> RexxSQL doesn't give you access to SQLCipher does it?
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got visibility?
> Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
> Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
> http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-users mailing list
> Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
