On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Art Heimsoth <artst...@artheimsoth.com>wrote:
> I have two systems where the memory and cpu speed are roughly equal, > however, one is running XP Pro and the other is Win7 Pro. When I start > an ooRexx program with ooDialog and ooSQLite, the initial load time is > considerably different. The XP system usually takes 7 seconds before the > initial panel is displayed, but has taken as long as 90 seconds. The Win7 > system consistently takes 1-2 seconds. The Win7 system is running 64bit > ooRexx, ooDialog and ooSQLite while the XP system is 32 bit. > > Does the bit difference make that much difference on initial load time? > Is there something I should check as to why the XP system sometimes > takes well over a minute to load. This longer time is usually when the > program is first run after an extended period of time (hours), but has > also happened after a short edit/update session of the program. > The program is roughly 3700 statements. > > I can't think of any reason for that. The difference between 32-bit and 64-bit should be any noticeable. You should at least try monitoring the load times by starting with task manage running before you start the program on each system and check out the cpu and memory usage to see if that gives you a clue. Other than that I don't have any tips. -- Mark Miesfeld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-users mailing list Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
