[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13205070#comment-13205070
 ] 

[email protected] commented on OOZIE-674:
-----------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3752/#review4996
-----------------------------------------------------------


At first, I understand that you are mapping your new EL function as CURRENT. 
Wandering about the code executed from line 201. Will that work for you?

Alternatively, what about this proposal.
getFuncType currently returns the function type based on fixed  function name 
--> function type mapping.
We can make it configurable through oozie-default/site.xml. By default, it will 
be current-->CURRENT, latest->latest. But it could extended by overriding the 
oozie properties in oozie-site.xml.

It could be flexible for future custom EL functions too.

The changes will mainly happen in oozie-default.xml, and getFunctionType 
method. 

what is you take on this approach?

 

- Mohammad


On 2012-02-09 09:26:21, shwethags wrote:
bq.  
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/3752/
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  
bq.  (Updated 2012-02-09 09:26:21)
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Review request for oozie.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Summary
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  I have an EL extension today(0,0) which maps to start day of nominal time. 
This is used to specify startInstance, endInstance and instance in dataIn and 
dataOut of coordinator.
bq.  
bq.  In CoordCommandUtils.resolveInstanceRange(), getInstanceNumber has to 
return the instance number with respect to current. So, for 
coord-action-create-inst context, I have mapped today to current and hence 
getInstanceNumber returns the correct number. But later in 
resolveInstanceRange(), getFuncType is called with startInstance value which is 
today in this case and it maps to UNEXPECTED and throws up. getFuncType should 
be passed the evaluation of coord-action-create-inst context
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  This addresses bug OOZIE-674.
bq.      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-674
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Diffs
bq.  -----
bq.  
bq.    
trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/CoordCommandUtils.java 
1240005 
bq.  
bq.  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3752/diff
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Testing
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  UT - TestCoordActionMaterializeCommand
bq.  Tested with coord:current instance range and EL extension
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Thanks,
bq.  
bq.  shwethags
bq.  
bq.


                
> resolveInstanceRange doesn't work for EL extensions
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-674
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-674
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Shwetha G S
>              Labels: EL, extension
>         Attachments: OOZIE-674.patch
>
>
> I have an EL extension today(0,0) which maps to start day of nominal time. 
> This is used to specify startInstance, endInstance and instance in dataIn and 
> dataOut of coordinator.
> In CoordCommandUtils.resolveInstanceRange(), getInstanceNumber has to return 
> the instance number with respect to current. So, for coord-action-create-inst 
> context, I have mapped today to current and hence getInstanceNumber returns 
> the correct number. But later in resolveInstanceRange(), getFuncType is 
> called with startInstance value which is today in this case and it maps to 
> UNEXPECTED and throws up. getFuncType should be passed the evaluation of 
> coord-action-create-inst context

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to