Ok, it shouldn't be too hard to update OP25 to support TSBK opcodes $30 and $38, but $14 is still a mystery... Please see the attached spreadsheet for a list of opcodes that we currently know about. If you have any info on any of the manufacturer specific opcodes, please feel free to let us know.
0x30 is a Harris Dynamic regrouping command:- [image: image.png] 0x38 is a standard authentication response:- [image: image.png] I'll see how we can go about getting these added in. I'm not sure what the best approach would be to reduce noise in the logs however - any ideas Max? Credit for the attached spreadsheet goes to Ellie Dugger (thnx Ellie!) Cheers, Matt On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 12:41, Kevin Utzy <krutz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Matt, > > > > Yes it is as a matter of fact it is. > > > > Kevin > > > > *From:* Matt Ames <matt.ames...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, January 20, 2023 20:24 > *To:* krutz...@gmail.com > *Cc:* op25-dev@lists.osmocom.org > *Subject:* Re: [op25-dev] Unsupported TSBK opcodes > > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > Is this by chance a Harris system that you are monitoring? > > Cheers, > Matt > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 10:36, <krutz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Minor request. > > It multi_rx.py it is difficult to find other issues because of messages > regarding unsupported TSBK opcodes. It isn't hurting but just filling the > log. Not sure how best to report these (increase the log level?). > > Examples in my case are as below: > received unsupported TSBK opcode 30 (b00000040000000033200000) > received unsupported TSBK opcode 38 (b800080c2e000c2e00010000) > received unsupported TSBK opcode 14 (9400000165ffff3125d70000) > > I understand the need to know about these but it isn't helpful to have the > log filling up with these. > > Kevin > >
TSBK_Reference_2021-05-08_1.xlsx
Description: MS-Excel 2007 spreadsheet
