> On 13 Sep 2016, at 11:26, Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote: > > On 13 Sep 2016, at 10:15, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buen...@erratique.ch> wrote: >> >> Had a look at this. It seems rather toyish at the moment and makes me wonder >> a bit about programmers building security infrastructure on top of libraries >> with obvious security risks... > > Is there something specific in OCaml-Acme that worries you, or is this a > general existential crisis about the state of software security that you are > experiencing?
Could we relax a bit? It’s only Tuesday. ;) _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
