On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buen...@erratique.ch> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 September 2016 at 11:26, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> Is there something specific in OCaml-Acme that worries you, or is this a >> general existential crisis about the state of software security that you are >> experiencing? > > Only waiting for people being sorry for using a library that doesn't check > the validity of the underlying encoding it is supposed to assert.
Hi Daniel, Could you please direct us to the bug report about this issue? Thanks, David > Best, > > Daniel > > > _______________________________________________ > Infrastructure mailing list > infrastruct...@lists.ocaml.org > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/infrastructure _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel