On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Bünzli
<daniel.buen...@erratique.ch> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 September 2016 at 11:26, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> Is there something specific in OCaml-Acme that worries you, or is this a 
>> general existential crisis about the state of software security that you are 
>> experiencing?
>
> Only waiting for people being sorry for using a library that doesn't check 
> the validity of the underlying encoding it is supposed to assert.

Hi Daniel,

Could you please direct us to the bug report about this issue?

Thanks,

David

> Best,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infrastructure mailing list
> infrastruct...@lists.ocaml.org
> http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/infrastructure
_______________________________________________
opam-devel mailing list
opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org
http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel

Reply via email to