On 12/6/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You seem to postulate the 2-dimensional nature. If it is a > postulate, then there is no discussion to have. If it is not, > then we should be able to derive that property. So, all I'm > doing is to see whether you can articulate the chain of logical > inference that would lead there. So, is it a postulate or > something we have hope to arrive to by logical inference? >
It is not a postulate. --------------- | x | x | x | x | x | x | --------------- What is the minimum set of numbers required per x to represent the relative location of each x above? (Whether you like to think of it as an intrinsically 1-dimensional curve or as curve embedded in a higher dimensional space.) Regards, Bill Page. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
