On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Bill Page wrote: | | On 12/6/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | > You seem to postulate the 2-dimensional nature. If it is a | > postulate, then there is no discussion to have. If it is not, | > then we should be able to derive that property. So, all I'm | > doing is to see whether you can articulate the chain of logical | > inference that would lead there. So, is it a postulate or | > something we have hope to arrive to by logical inference? | > | | It is not a postulate. | | --------------- | | x | | x | | x | | x | | x | | x | | | --------------- | | What is the minimum set of numbers required per x to represent the | relative location of each x above?
I don't know,. What are they? -- Gaby ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
