On 26 Feb 2008 06:26:50 -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Ralf Hemmecke writes:
>
> | > In OpenAxiom-1.2.0, you can use { } to construct sets directly.
> |
> | Gaby,
> |
> | I don't know whether you want to make SPAD syntax more similar
> | to Aldor,
>
>
> I'd, like as much as possible, to retain good aspects of Axiom as
> originally by defined Jenks&Sutor while expanding it to solve
> harder problems and taking advantages of recent advances in
> system design and implementations.
>
+1 Hear, hear!
I agree completely with Gaby about this. I do not think that it would
be a good policy to deliberately make OpenAxiom look more like Aldor.
Aldor exists, is (mostly) open source and has it's own development
path (hopefully). OpenAxiom should be free to evolve in possibly new
(and better) ways.
Regards,
Bill Page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
