Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | But at least if I defined constants it should be no problem as in the
| > | following program.
| > | | #include "aldor"
| > | #include "aldorio"
| > | f(a: Integer): (Integer, DoubleFloat) == {
| > | b: Integer == 2;
| > | b: DoubleFloat == 7.0;
| > | (b, b);
| > | }
| > | import from Integer, DoubleFloat;
| > | (i, d) := f(1);
| > | stdout << i << ", " << d << newline;
| > | | It is completely clear what the last b's are.
| > It may be completely clear to some, not so obvious to others.
|
| The return type says everything.
The return type clearly says what the function returns, no dispute
there. How do you feel about
f(a: Integer): (Integer, DoubleFloat) == {
b: Integer == 2;
b: DoubleFloat == 7.0;
(b, b);
(b, b);
Is it OK?
-- Gaby
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
