I can't make everyone happy. Munging reply-to is a problem for those whom you want to reply to directly. However, I've been "plagued" with people replying to me directly with very insightful ideas that I would have preferred that they share with the list, but netiquette says that I can't just forward the email myself. In the spirit of sharing, I don't mind inconveniencing a few people. But if I get enough complaints and not enough counter-complaints, I will change it back.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:02:00 +0100, Peter Bortas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:06:21 +0000, Richard Aspden > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do have my "reply to all" button of course, but I think to be honest > > to an extent I've been influenced by the 95% of other lists I'm on that > > do it. Guess it's habit more than anything. > > > > Still, my vote rests with Reply-to: being set to list. > > Reply-To is plain evil, so I'll vote against. > > -- > Peter Bortas > _______________________________________________ > Open-graphics mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com) > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
