I don't care about that either. Besides, Windows drivers are written in C anyhow. They don't even provide graphical tools for compiling drivers--you have to use command-line tools for that.
We'll have C code which can be reused or rewritten or whatever that does basic stuff that drivers need to do, and the Windows guys can do what they want with it. On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:52:46 -0500, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:21, Timothy Miller wrote: > > I say we just push > > forward with the assumption that building the driver for Windows will > > require VS, the DDK, and some instructions about what code from the > > DDK may have to be modified in some way or other (a patch). If > > someone helps us to change that, GREAT, but it's not critical. > > I don't know about MS's interpretation of the C++ standard, but VS > doesn't even come close to C99. Just one more thing to think about. > > Regards, > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
