On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:52:46 -0500, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know about MS's interpretation of the C++ standard, but VS > doesn't even come close to C99. Just one more thing to think about.
That used to be true, but VS2003 is at least lot closer accepting standard code than VS6 was. The code that comes from the win32-developers I work with doesn't seem to need major surgery to get it to compile with a standard C++ compiler any more. -- Peter Bortas _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
