On Tuesday 08 February 2005 23:34, Timothy Miller wrote: > Ummm.... one for each horizontal correction, and one for each > perspective correction. Am I missing something here?
I could swear you missed the pixel pairs, which need to be corrected separately. > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:28:01 -0500, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 20:31, Timothy Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:24:51 -0500, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > 17 for vertical and 34 for horizontal, isn't it? > > > > > > 34 total. > > > > I thought each pixel pair needs two multipliers per perspective > > corrected interpolant. > > > > Regards, > > > > Daniel _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
