On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:32, Timothy Miller wrote:
> Hobbyist/Project Developer:
>   FGPA RTL only
>   Binary redistribution allowed.
>   Source registribution not allowed.
>   Re-licensing not allowed.
>   Design level improvement must be contributed back
>   RTL level improvement must be contributed back
>   Cheap license cost (person is effectively a project developer).
>
> I haven't really thought through all the differences carefully. 
> Consider this an example of possible license differentiation points.

No form of license fee will fly for project developers.  Restricted 
redistribution will put the project in the category of "non-free" for 
no good reason.  Not many will join.

Regards,

Daniel
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to