On 5/18/05, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:32, Timothy Miller wrote: > > Hobbyist/Project Developer: > > FGPA RTL only > > Binary redistribution allowed. > > Source registribution not allowed. > > Re-licensing not allowed. > > Design level improvement must be contributed back > > RTL level improvement must be contributed back > > Cheap license cost (person is effectively a project developer). > > > > I haven't really thought through all the differences carefully. > > Consider this an example of possible license differentiation points. > > No form of license fee will fly for project developers. Restricted > redistribution will put the project in the category of "non-free" for > no good reason. Not many will join.
Which project developers? And you speak for all of them? _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
