On 5/31/05, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm assuming that, being a member of the PCI SIG, if I have an extra > > legitimate copy of the PCI spec, that I can lend it out to someone. I > > can't imagine copyright law saying otherwise. > > That is correct. If you haven't signed a license agreement prohibiting > it, they have no say in the matter, and copyright law is not involved > since you're not making a copy. > > > Anyhow, is there anyone > > with a sufficient background in chip design who is also a good > > nit-picker who would be willing to look at the PCI core I've been > > working on and critique it? > > If I can find some time (perhaps on the weekend), I'll take a look at > it. I already have access to the PCI spec (I wrote two PCI master and > slave implementations using PIO in software!), and I've done a lot of > VHDL design. But I know little about Verilog. > > For those that don't have the actual PCI spec, the next best thing > is the book "PCI System Architecture". It's not sufficient for > someone wanting to do a thorough analysis of the compliance of a > design, but it's generally sufficient for logic design. > > Is the OGC a bus master, or only a slave?
At this point in the design process, it's a slave, but I will be adding mastering. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
