Ok, so the triangle thing could be useful only when it's in color. Good for web sites, for instance.
But a B&W logo should still have some kind of 3D-ness to it, even better if it's actually generated by the model... On 10/5/05, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 05 October 2005 09:24, Timothy Miller wrote: > > I just noticed that Bart, on Bart's place, had picked one of our test > > images as the logo for that section of his website. See the link > > below. While, I have some other ideas for what the Traversal logo > > should look like, I was thinking that perhaps the image he chose could > > be the official logo for the Open Graphics Project (Open Graphics > > Foundation, perhaps later). > > > > http://soapbox.bartsplace.net/index.php?topic=Graphics > > > > There are a few other test images we could consider also. Is this one > > too simple? It certainly strikes ME as being recognizable. > > > > Thoughts? > > The first time I made a logo, it was a full-colour one, and when the marketing > people saw it they nearly fainted :-). Having a version that can be printed > black on white is pretty much mandatory. > > I've played a bit with the double triangle shape, but it becomes a big and > rather uninteresting quadrangle when displayed in a single colour... > > Lourens > > > _______________________________________________ > Open-graphics mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com) > > > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
