On 10/23/05, dsp Mind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If OGD could solve/mitigate the above problems, (as I see it would, if > properly > targetted), OGD is not going to be just for OGC development. > It would be revolutionary in terms the way world is going to > see FOSS h/w development. If it becomes compelling one day someone > like Tim or Monty of Xiph is going to make a competent FOSS > verilog synthesising tool. I see brilliant future for OGD. > > I wish that we realise the need to target these interfaces as not > just a by-product of OGC development, but as an equaly important > component for survival of OGC and other FOSS h/w projects of future. > Thats all from me regarding efficacy of OGD and importance of > a properly thought out technically/strategically superior interface.
Let's get those T-shirts going so we can get some money in here so Howard, Andy, and I can spend more time on OGD and less on Tech Source. My only concern about the T-shirts is feeding any vaporware perceptions. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
