On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 19:34 -0500, Timothy Miller wrote: > The intent has been to have dual-link, so I'll point this out to Andy. > It's also possible that he or I simply made a clerical error in > making the list.
No, it's me who can't read, I missed the (2) for some reason.. Ben. > On 11/26/05, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > (2) Silicon Image SiI178 64-pin TQFP > > > > A single SIL178, that is single link. Do you intend to have dual link > > capable output from the FPGA/ASIC, thus allowing to use two SIL178 in > > master/slave mode for dual link (or some other dual link single chip > > transmitter) in the future ? > > > > Cheers, > > Ben. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
