On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:00:43 +0100 Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:58:45 +0100 > Nicolas Boulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Traversal would lose everything, because there is no line that > > > separates OGP from Traversal. > > > > I mind that FOSS people know that. So, i think they trust you. > > Correction: We know that. Others most probaly dont. I would say I know that now (I'm fairly new to OGP), but I did not know it yesterday, so I would assume anyone off-list does not know that. On the other hand, how does LML ( http://www.linuxmedialabs.com/ ) do to achieve the same effect ? They state explicitly their goals on their website ( http://www.linuxmedialabs.com/About_LML.php?subject=about ) : "The competitive advantage of our boards is in the use of the GNU General Public License, which significantly reduces software driver development costs while providing the highest software code quality possible." A similar statement should be in the "About Traversal" section of the upcoming website, and I believe this would be enough. Oh, and as stated earlier in the same thread, "the FOSS community has developed a general fear of 'evil *big* companies'" (my emphasis on big). Traversal is a long way from being NVIDIA or ATI, size-wise. François _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
