On 3/3/06, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, Mercurial ("hg") or git is better for distributed development.
> Subversion requires that everything be centralized, and you get to
> dicker where THE central server lives, dicker about who have commit
> privs, and to what.
>I don't mind using a better tool. But we already have an established SVN server. Were we to make a transition, we'd have to do it in a way that was minimally disruptive. And we'd have to weigh the costs against the benefits. Perhaps we should continue using SVN for what we have now and use somethings else for things like software drivers. (Perhaps not?) _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
