On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:41:52 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, Mercurial ("hg") or git is better for distributed development.
> Subversion requires that everything be centralized, and you get to
> dicker where THE central server lives, dicker about who have commit
> privs, and to what.
I really wonder what's going on. Whenever someone mentiones that
project X is using svn, imediatly someone pops up and says that
svn is suboptimal for a distributed development. Do you really think
that everyone wants an absolutely distributed development where
everyone can have his own tree? Do you really think that there
is not someone out there who'd perfere a centralized solution?
Just to state once again what i always tell such people:
This is not about a development model, this is about doing
development.
Attila Kinali
--
心をこめて聞け心をこめて話せ
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
