James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Lourens Veen wrote:
On Saturday 04 March 2006 17:19, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
Don't forget to run it through the W3C validator and put the passed
logo at the bottom of the page.
And yes, it passed. :-)
I know, I checked before posting. Got it right the first time as
well. As for the logo, the way I see it every web page should be
valid HTML.
I agree 100% with that. Mangled HTML is a major problem for the KDE
Konqueror project.
You don't put a logo on your business correspondence saying that it
was written in proper English (or whichever language), everyone will
assume that it is. The same goes for web sites, IMHO.
OTOH, I see using the logo as a method of promoting the use of correct
HTML code in web pages.
I agree with Lourens here. While the website should absolutely *use*
correct HTML, OGP is a graphics hardware project, not a web project, and
shouldn't really concern itself with *promoting* HTML.
--
dolphinling
<http://dolphinling.net/>
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
