On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:55:11 -0500
"Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll wait until Howard sees the rest of what you said before
> commenting on it, but I can answer to this part. There are two
> problems with doing what you ask here. One is board space. The other
> is signal integrity. Whenever you route a signal to more than one
> place, you end up with reflections from unterminated ends, and these
> signals for the highspeed DAC are already routed to two places.
I thought that this might prevent it.
> Keep in mind that if OGA has more than one head, what it can do won't
> be identical to OGD. If you're really intending to use OGD as a
> graphics card, you're wasting your money, or you're willing to spend
> the extra money for the highspeed DAC (which, relatively speaking,
> isn't all that much).
I intend to use it as a graphics card. Why? Because if nobody
is really using it, then it will not be fully tested. I do not
care if it's slower than the end product or noisy or anything,
as long as it works :)
Attila Kinali
--
心をこめて聞け心をこめて話せ
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
