In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ray Heasman writes: > On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 12:34 -0500, Richard Smith wrote: > > Seem to me Ray what you are thinking as embeddedy is a bit below the > > target for the OGA asic. The embedded we are talking is the the > > single board pc market type stuff. The throw a PC at it area. > > *nod* Fair enough. I want to be proved wrong here. :-)
I think the word "embedded" is a poor choice for this. I (and probably Ray) think of embedded as things like a GPS, not a general purpose computer. How about: "on-mainboard-graphics" ? > > And in my experience with using these chips the support mostly > > non-existent. Or worse the rep tells you there is support but by the > > time you reach a real problem you already understand more about the > > chip than most of the FAE's and can't find (or not allowed) anyone who > > _really_ understands the hardware and can anwer difficult questions. > > *nod* My experience is that support is always non-existent, for just > about anything. :-P No matter what you pay for or who you talk to, it's > not worth the money or time. You get any source code and documentation > you can and you figure it out. Support is easy. Just get your VP to wave a million dollar PO in the face of their VP. What's that? You don't have a million dollar PO? No support for you. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
