On Thu, 25 May 2006 15:12:54 +0400 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lately I did some brief overview of high-level hardware modeling > libraries (frameworks) for programming language Haskell (see > http://haskell.org). > > While all of the available tools are either too low-level or > semi-functional (Hawk - http://www.cse.ogi.edu/PacSoft/projects/Hawk/ - > I failed to compile examples) I succeed to reconstruct some essentials > that allows high-level models to be implemented quick enough. Although i see the sense behind using haskell or hawk for high level modeling/simulation, i advice against using it. Learning an additional language to get going is a lot of work and might produce unneccesary delays and problems. Also having all simmulation from highlevel to low level in the same language has the advantage that we can use the same simulation enviroment to verify everything. If there is a need to use a different language than a HDL, we should use C or C++ as with those we have at least a chance to integrate it into a simulator. Attila Kinali -- 心をこめて聞け心をこめて話せ _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
