On 5/30/06, Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:40:14 -0400
"Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the cat's out of the bag. Apparently, I accidentally CC'd the
> list with the Traversal logo (well, a version of it).
Always watch your CC list :)
> So, I was talking to Howard about registering it real quick, and he
> had two thoughts about this. One is that the logo is going to be WAY
> too hard to silkscreen onto something. When you start shrinking it
> and playing about with it, it loses its definition. He also thinks
> that it's not worth the $275. "If someone steals it, let them have
> it; we'll make another one."
That's true. If you really paid nearly $300 for that logo
it's a rip off. It reminds me of the graphs we did with
mathematica in highschool (actually there was one plot
that looked really like the logo).
Well, I feel an attachment to it, since I designed it and wrote the code. :)
Are you saying you don't like it? :)
And Howards points are valid. You cannot easily scale this
logo without makeing it unrecognizable.
So, one idea was to reduce the number of striped. Perhaps after
playing a bit with the widths and spacings, we might make something
reasonable Perhaps not.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
