On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:24:32PM +0200, Lourens Veen wrote:
> How about this one then. You want to order a video card from the 
> Traversal Technology web shop. For that, the shop needs your address, 
> so they can send you the package, and your credit card number, so they 
> can charge you. Of course, you don't want them to pass on that 
> information to anyone else. So, you encrypt it, and require them to use 
> software that won't let them do anything with the information but send 
> you a package and charge you.
> 
> Of course, they would have to agree to use such software, and it would 
> have to be open source so that you could check whether it works 
> correctly.

If the software is free (|| open source) to them, there's nothing stopping
them from modifying it, and the situation is the same as without DRM:  you
have to trust whomever you trade with.

In fact, I think it's probably better if they're bound to not give away your
personal information, rather than them being bound to be *unable* to give your
personal information away:  in both cases, they're promising to refrain from
some action that's easily possible.

Better then to give them greater capabilities, since the DRM-infested software
is a (proper) subset of all software performing those particular actions
you mention, and by not restricting themselves to DRM-infested software,
there's more supply, and hence lower prices, hopefully to the benefit of the
consumer.

-- 
See the hash key is bollocks:  I press it... no hash.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to