Dieter wrote: > It appears that OGD1 will be PCI-X for some reason. I hope this doesn't > carry over into OGC1.
if the PCI-X is properly done, it should be compatible with standard 32 bits PCI > My crystal ball says PCI will go away, but slower than AGP. The > problem will be too few slots per board. (Even worse than now.) especially as PCIe anything other than graphics cards seems to have trouble coming out > The real unserved market is Ethernet, but I don't expect to be able > to convince anyone of that. heh... make that the Open-X-Terminal ;D >> Can we get the performance we need with 65 nm or do we need >> to go smaller? > > If the design were ready today, could we even get 65 nm? Isn't AMD > still using 90 nm? AMD is going to 65 as we speak for the next generation due in a few months > >>> If I want an OpenGL card, I will buy a nVidia or ATI card that is >>> reasonably well supported by an open source driver. In fact, I nvidia then doesn't count (at least, yet)... > You mention "distros", so is this something specific to linux? you can consider solaris, and the various *BSD as distros of the same stuff :D
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
