> > > > > > Are there any plans for advanced hardware de-interlacing? > > > > > > > > > > There are no plans to NOT do it. If we can fit it in with all the > > > > > other stuff, we'll do it. > > > > > > > > Interlace problems are incredibly annoying. Good interlace/de-interlace > > > > is not optional. > > > > > > For video capture, which OGD1 doesn't do. OGA specifies graphics > > > rendering and video output. > > > > You lost me. Are you saying that if it doesn't fit, it gets pushed to > > software? > > No. I'm saying that OGP is trying to be realistic and not design > products we can't build. We have decided not to develop video capture > technology yet so that we can get much more important things done > first. > > If you want de-interlacing, it'll be a function of whatever video > capture card you decide to buy.
The video source could be from a wide variety of formats. The user has no control over that. Might be interlaced, might be progressive. Might be top field first or bottom field first. Might involve pullup/pulldown. Might be grossly wrong and need correction. (yes really, even from sources that should know better) > > > I'm talking with some other people about > > > a separate video-capture device. > > > > Meaning a 6th generation ATSC demodulator? > > What? To capture over the air digital tv broadcasts in the US you need an ATSC demodulator. The latest ones are 5th generation and leave room for improvement. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
