On 6/29/06, Jussi Vainionpää <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Are there any plans for advanced hardware de-interlacing? > > > > > > There are no plans to NOT do it. If we can fit it in with all the > > > other stuff, we'll do it. > > > > Interlace problems are incredibly annoying. Good interlace/de-interlace > > is not optional. > > For video capture, which OGD1 doesn't do. OGA specifies graphics > rendering and video output. I'm talking with some other people about > a separate video-capture device. > I meant output. For example 1080i HDTV video (from digital stream/file source) usually needs to be deinterlaced. Obviously this can be done also in software so while hq hardware acceleration would be very nice, it is not really a must. Deinterlacing 1080i with quality requires quite a lot of processing capasity, and it seems like a problem that would parallelize quite nicely on hardware.
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. 1080i is an interlaced mode. If it's to be deinterlaced, that would be done by the monitor/tv. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
