On 7/11/06, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The company could still be a good citizen though. What if they added a whole lot of stuff to the design, published the combined work under the GPL (including all their own stuff) and then sold the hardware? I'd say they'd be an asset to the community, since they didn't violate any licences, and contributed themselves as well. So I think OHF should give them some kind of certificate then, to show that they're "community-friendly".
Good point. This would be especially good if they allowed Traversal to use it under our dual license terms (i.e. we can resell it). Yes, so I would be much less bothered by someone actually adding value to the design, whether or not Traversal could use it. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
