On Tuesday 11 July 2006 13:12, Patrick McNamara wrote: > Timothy Miller wrote: > > On 7/11/06, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Monday 10 July 2006 05:58, Patrick McNamara wrote: > >> > vsync: > >> > NOOP 1 ; last 4 pixels of hsync > >> > NOOP 2 [h] ; back porch > >> > NOOP 640 [h] ; active period, but vblank > >> > NOOP 2 [h] ; front porch > >> > >> This looks downright silly, and it could be misleading too. This > >> subroutine is definitely doing something, but if you look at it you > >> wouldn't say so. Could we write NODATA instead of NOOP? > > > > How about SIG ? > > I'm open for just about anything. I agree that NOOP is probably the > wrong the mnemonic to use for this command. I was pondering it when I > was working with the compiler last night. I didn't come up with a good > replacement that had a useful meaning. Suggestions are good. >
ASSERT beacause all it does is assert signals. Hamish.
pgpw9Cx9usOJp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
