Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.bolignet-aarhus.dk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
"info for details.
Content preview: On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:11:27AM -0400, Timothy Miller
wrote:> 3: hsync polarity
(1 - positive, 0 - negative)> 2: vsync polarity (1 - positive, 0 - negative)Why
not 1 => negative, as that seems to be how [most of the stuff I know howworks]
works? F
Content analysis details: (4,91 points, 3,00 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2,8 USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT To: username at front of subject
-0,6 BAYES_01 Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 10%
0,5 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0,0 NO_RDNS2 Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
1,0 MR_DIFF_MID
0,6 J_CHICKENPOX_16
0,6 J_CHICKENPOX_83
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:11:27AM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
> 3: hsync polarity (1 - positive, 0 - negative)
> 2: vsync polarity (1 - positive, 0 - negative)
Why not 1 => negative, as that seems to be how [most of the stuff I know how
works] works? For instance, two-complement and sign/magnitude ints, as well
as IEEE $std_id floats.
Now, as you've probably forgotten, I wear my C hacker hat, not my hardware
designer hat (haven't got one of those). As such, I may have overlooked some
reason. But if it's only a question of whether or not to follow conventions,
please *do* follow conventions.
Please enlighten me,
Jonas
--
See the hash key is bollocks: I press it... no hash.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
